If we knew the Balogun deal was dead why did we still proceed with the Ndiaye sale?
Posted by Robin·
Zirkzee’s a loan. Grealish is a loan. AMN is £4m. We didn’t need to bring in £60m if Balogun was off so why sell our best player if we weren’t going to invest the proceeds?
TLDR
Responses
Post a Response
Replying to If we knew the Balogun deal was dead why did we still proceed with the Ndiaye sale? by Robin. This stays inside this thread — it will not create a new thread.
Sign in or create an account to reply.