As of now, we’re very short in the wide areas…
Posted by Robin·
LB = Mykolenko
LW = George
RB = (no one, really, but Rohl and Patterson)
RW = Johnson, Dibling
That looks WELL short, to me. Tete will help but I still don’t love us going into the next four months with just one full back option on either side. Suspect Garner and Rohl, particularly, are going to have to fill in on a fair few occasions.
In the attacking areas, even if we bring Grealish in, the right hand side looks vulnerable. And we can only play one of Grealish / George on the left at the same time (I prefer George - not least because Mykolenko is little use as an overlapping full back, which is all the more important if Grealish plays there).
Concerned.
TLDR
Responses
- Better than being wide in the short areas. nt
- The deal for the lad Fulham were back-filling Tete with has stalled . So the search may go on ...nt
- Maybe Grealish would also be cover for KDH at 10? nt.
- I’d say short of LB cover only if Jack comes in nt
- Garner can play right all down the flank nt
- Tete and grealish will be done and we’ll have a couple of loan slots nt
- Would seem odd to let Aznou go with no one else lined up as cover. nt.
- it's well short but the committee has awoken Bagpus like (nt)
- but we still have SPEND POWER.. murphy? nt

